if constexpr (C++17)
Compile-time conditional evaluation in templates
The Problem: SFINAE Complexity
Before C++17, conditional template logic required SFINAE techniques that were verbose and error-prone.
// C++11/14: SFINAE for conditional behavior
template<typename T>
typename std::enable_if<std::is_integral<T>::value, std::string>::type
type_name() {
return "integer";
}
template<typename T>
typename std::enable_if<std::is_floating_point<T>::value, std::string>::type
type_name() {
return "floating point";
}
// Verbose, requires overloads, hard to readC++17: if constexpr
if constexpr evaluates conditions at compile-time, discarding the non-taken branch.
// C++17: Clean compile-time branching
template<typename T>
auto type_name() {
if constexpr (std::is_integral_v<T>) {
return "integer";
} else if constexpr (std::is_floating_point_v<T>) {
return "floating point";
} else {
return "other";
}
}
// Single function, clear logic, no SFINAE needed!How It Works
The discarded branch is not instantiated, so it can contain code that wouldn't compile for that type.
template<typename T>
void process(T value) {
if constexpr (std::is_pointer_v<T>) {
// This branch is only compiled when T is a pointer
std::cout << "Pointer to: " << *value << std::endl;
} else {
// This branch is only compiled when T is not a pointer
// *value would be a compile error here if T isn't a pointer
// but it's discarded for pointer types!
std::cout << "Value: " << value << std::endl;
}
}
process(42); // Prints "Value: 42"
process(&answer); // Prints "Pointer to: 42"Key Characteristics
Compile-Time Only
Condition must be a constant expression. No runtime overhead.
Discarded Branch
Non-taken branch is not instantiated. Can have invalid code for that type.
Template Context
Must be in a template context. Doesn't work in regular functions.
Return Type
All branches must still produce compatible return types.
Practical Examples
1. Type-Safe Container Printing
template<typename Container>
void print(const Container& c) {
if constexpr (requires { c.key_comp(); }) {
// It's an associative container (map/set)
std::cout << "Associative container:" << std::endl;
for (const auto& [key, value] : c) {
std::cout << " " << key << " -> " << value << std::endl;
}
} else {
// It's a sequence container
std::cout << "Sequence container:" << std::endl;
for (const auto& elem : c) {
std::cout << " " << elem << std::endl;
}
}
}2. Generic Serializer
template<typename T>
std::string serialize(const T& value) {
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<T, std::string>) {
return """ + value + """;
} else if constexpr (std::is_arithmetic_v<T>) {
return std::to_string(value);
} else if constexpr (requires { value.serialize(); }) {
return value.serialize();
} else {
static_assert(false, "Cannot serialize this type");
}
}3. Deep Copy Helper
template<typename T>
auto deep_copy(const T& value) {
if constexpr (std::is_pointer_v<T>) {
// Deep copy for pointers
return value ? std::make_unique<std::remove_pointer_t<T>>(*value)
: nullptr;
} else if constexpr (requires { value.clone(); }) {
// Use clone() method if available
return value.clone();
} else {
// Default: copy construction
return T{value};
}
}Common Pitfalls
1. Must Be in Template Context
// ERROR: if constexpr only works in templates
void regular_function(bool flag) {
if constexpr (flag) { // ERROR: not a template
// ...
}
}
// CORRECT: Must be templated
template<bool flag>
void templated_function() {
if constexpr (flag) { // OK
// ...
}
}2. All Branches Must Compile (Return Type)
template<typename T>
auto bad_function(T value) {
if constexpr (std::is_integral_v<T>) {
return value; // Returns int
} else {
return std::to_string(value); // Returns string
}
// ERROR: Incompatible return types!
}
// SOLUTION: Use common type or explicit return
template<typename T>
std::common_type_t<T, std::string> good_function(T value) {
if constexpr (std::is_integral_v<T>) {
return value;
} else {
return std::to_string(value);
}
}C++20 Concepts + if constexpr
C++20 concepts provide an even cleaner approach for many use cases:
// C++20: Concepts often replace if constexpr
template<typename T>
void process(T value)
requires std::integral<T> || std::floating_point<T>
{
// Only accepts arithmetic types
}
// But if constexpr is still useful for:
// - Implementation details within a function
// - Optimization paths
// - When you need the same interface but different implementationsBest Practices
- ✓Replace SFINAE with
if constexprwhen possible (clearer code) - ✓Use
requiresexpressions (C++20) in conditions when appropriate - ✓Keep branches focused and simple
- ✗Don't use for runtime conditions (regular
ifis clearer) - ✗Avoid deeply nested
if constexprchains (consider specialization instead)